Sponsored Links

Jumat, 01 Juni 2018

Sponsored Links

Why three generations of this multiracial American family marched ...
src: thegroundtruthproject.org

Multiracial Americans are Americans who have mixed descendants of "two or more races". The term may also include racially mixed Americans who identify with only one cultural and social group (see one-drop rule). In the US census 2010, about 9 million people, or 2.9% of the population, identified themselves as multiracial. There is evidence that accounting by genetic ancestors will produce higher numbers. Historical reasons, including slavery that create racial caste and European-American oppression of Native Americans, often make people identify or classified by only one ethnic, generally from the culture in which they were raised. Before the mid-20th century, many people hid their multiracial heritage due to racial discrimination against minorities. While many Americans may be biologically multiracial, they often do not know it or do not identify culturally, more than they retain all the different traditions of national ancestors.

After a long period of formal racial segregation in the former Confederates after the Reconstruction Era, and the prohibition of interracial marriages in different parts of the country, more people openly formed racial unity. In addition, social conditions have changed and many multiracial people do not believe it is socially advantageous to try to "pass" as white. Diverse immigration has brought more racially mixed people to the United States, such as significant Hispanic populations that identify as mestizos. Since the 1980s, the United States has had an increasingly multiracial identity movement (eg, Loving Day). As more and more Americans insist on recognizing the origin of their mixed race, the 2000 census for the first time allowed the population to examine more than one ethno-racial identity and thus identify it as multiracial. In 2008 Barack Obama was elected the first President of the United States biracial; he acknowledges both sides of his family and identifies as African Americans.

Currently, multiracial individuals are found in every corner of the country. Multiracial groups in the United States include many Mestizo Americans, Americans, African Americans, Louisiana Creoles, Hapas, Melungeons, Lumbees, Houmas, and several other communities found mainly in the Eastern US. Many multiracial Native Americans in their ancestors whilst identifying fully as members of a federally recognized tribe.


Video Multiracial Americans



History

Americans are largely multi-ethnic descendants of different culturally diverse groups of immigrants, many of whom have now developed nations. Some consider themselves multiracial, while acknowledging race as a social construction. Creation, assimilation and integration have continued. The Movement of Civil Rights and other social movements since the mid-twentieth century worked to achieve social justice and the upholding of equal civil rights under the constitution for all ethnicities. In the 2000s, less than 5% of the population was identified as multiracial. In many instances, mixed race ancestors are very far in the history of one's family (eg, before the Civil War or earlier), that it does not affect the more recent ethnic and cultural identification.

Race-to-race, general-law marriage and marriage occurred from the earliest colonial years, especially before slavery was hardened as a racial caste associated with Africans in the British colony. Virginia and other British colonies passed a law in the seventeenth century that gave children the social status of their mothers, in accordance with the principle of the Partiter sequitur ventrem, irrespective of race or dad's citizenship. This reverses the principle of English common law in which a man gives his status to his children - this has enabled the public to prosecute fathers in favor of their children, whether valid or not. The change enhances the ability of white men to sexually use sexual slaves, as they are not responsible for children. As lords and fathers of mixed race children born as slaves, men can use these people as servants or laborers or sell them as slaves. In some cases, white fathers provide their multiracial children, pay or organize education or internships and release them, especially during the two decades after the American Revolution. (The practice of providing children is more common in French and Spanish colonies, where color classes of people develop into educators and property owners.) Many other white fathers leave mixed-race children and their mothers into slavery.

Researcher Paul Heinegg found that most of the colored free-skinned families of the colonial period were founded from the white women's unions, both free and obligatory servants, and African men, slaves, compulsory or free. In the early years, working class people live and work together. Their children are free because of the status of white women. This is in contrast to the pattern in the post-Revolution era, where most of the mixed race children have white fathers and slave mothers.

Anti-marriage laws were passed in most countries in the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries, but this did not prevent white slave owners, their sons, or other strong white men from taking female slaves as concubines and have children multiracs with them. In California and the western US, there are more Latin and Asian inhabitants. This is prohibited from official contact with whites. The white legislator passed a law prohibiting marriage between Europe and Asia America until the 1950s.

Early American history

Race relationships have a long history in North America and the United States, beginning with mixing of European explorers and soldiers, who make indigenous women friends. After increasing European settlement, traders and fur-catchers often marry or have union with indigenous women. In the seventeenth century, faced with a critical and continuous scarcity of labor, the colonists, especially in the Chesapeake Bay Colony, imported Africans as laborers, sometimes as identified servants and, increasingly, as slaves. African slaves were also imported to New York and other northern ports by the Netherlands and then England. Some African slaves were freed by their masters during these early years.

In the colonial years, while the conditions were more fluid, white women, servants or free, and African men, servants, slaves or free, made unions. Because the women are free, their mixed race children are born free; they and their descendants formed the majority of free-skinned families during the colonial period in Virginia. Cleric Paul Heinegg found that eighty percent of the color-free people in North Carolina in the census from 1790-1810 could be traced to free families in Virginia in the colonial years.

In 1789 Olaudah Equiano, a former Nigerian slave who was enslaved in North America, published his autobiography. He advocated marriage between the whites and the blacks. At the end of the XVIII century, visitors in the South Upstream noted the high proportion of mixed race slaves, evidence of white-skinned miscegenation.

In 1790, the first federal population census was taken in the United States. The enumerators are instructed to classify the free population as whites or "others." Only household heads were identified by name in the federal census until 1850. Native Americans were among "Other;" in subsequent censuses, they are included as "People of color-free dress" if they do not live in the place of the Indians. The slaves were counted separately from free men in all censuses until the Civil War and the end of slavery. In the later census, people of African descent were classified on the basis of appearances as mulatto (which is acknowledged to be European or African ancestry) or black.

After the American Revolutionary War, the number and proportions of color-free people increased significantly in the North and South as slaves were freed. Most northern states abolish slavery, sometimes, like New York, in a gradual emancipation program that takes more than two decades to complete. The last slaves in New York were not released until 1827. In connection with the Second Enlightenment preacher, the Great Southern Methodist and Preachers urged slave owners to free their slaves. The revolutionary ideals encouraged many men to free their slaves, some by deeds and others by will, so from 1782 to 1810, the percentage of color-free people rose from less than one percent to nearly 10 percent of blacks in the South. <19th_century: 19th_century: _American_Civil_War.2C_emancipation.2C_Reconstruction_and_Jim_Crow "> 19th_century: _American_Civil_War, _emancipation, _Reconstruction_and_Jim_Crow"> 19th century: American Civil War, emancipation, Reconstruction and Jim Crow

Of the many relationships between the male slave holder, the supervisor, or the son of the employer and the female slave, the most prominent possibility is President Thomas Jefferson with his slave, Sally Hemings. As stated in the collaborative Smithsonian-Monticello 2012 exhibition, Slavery at Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty , Jefferson, then a widower, took Hemings as his concubine for nearly 40 years. They have six children recorded; four Hemings children survived to adulthood, and he freed them all, among the very few slaves he freed. Two people were allowed to "escape" to the North in 1822, and two were granted freedom by his will to his death in 1826. Seven-eight with his ancestors, his four sons who Hemings moved to the northern states as adults; three out of four entered the white community, and all of their descendants were identified as whites. From the descendants of Madison Hemings, who continue to be identified as black, some in future generations eventually identified as white and "married", while others continue to identify as African Americans. Socially beneficial for Hemings children to be identified as whites, according to their appearance and the proportion of the majority of their ancestors. Despite being born into slavery, Hemings' children were legally white under Virginia law at the time.

20th century

Racial discrimination continues to apply in new laws in the 20th century, for example the one-drop rule enacted in the 1924 Racial Integrity Act in Virginia and in the other southern states, partly influenced by the popularity of eugenics and the idea of ​​racial purity. People bury faded memories that many whites have multiracial offspring. Many families are multiracial. Similar laws have been proposed but not endorsed by the end of the nineteenth century in South Carolina and Virginia, for example. After regaining political power in the Southern states by depriving them of blacks, the white Democrats passed legislation to impose Jim Crow and racial segregation to restore white supremacy. They defended this until it was forced to change in the 1960s and thereafter by the enforcement of federal laws authorizing to oversee practices to protect the constitutional rights of African Americans and other minority citizens.

In 1967, the case of the United States Supreme Court, Loving v. Virginia decided that anti-marriage laws were unconstitutional.

In the 20th century to 1989, social service organizations typically assign multiracial children to the racial identity of minority parents, reflecting hypodecent social practices. Black social workers have influenced court decisions about identity-related rules; they argue that, since the birchal child is socially considered black, it should be classified as such to identify with groups and learn to deal with discrimination.

In 1990, the Census Bureau included more than a dozen ethnic/racial categories in the census, reflecting not only changing the social idea of ​​ethnicity, but the various immigrants who came to the United States due to changes in historical and new forces. immigration laws in the 1960s. With a changing society, more and more people are beginning to press for recognizing multiracial ancestors. The Census Bureau alters its data collection by allowing people to identify themselves as more than one ethnic group. Some ethnic groups are concerned about potential political and economic effects, as federal aid to historically underserved groups depends on Census data. According to the Census Bureau, in 2002, more than 75% of all African Americans have multiracial ancestors.

The proportion of recognized multiracial children in the United States grows. Interracial partnerships are on the rise, as are transcription adoptions. In 1990, about 14% from 18 to 19 years, 12% from 20 to 21 years, and 7% from 34 to 35 years old were involved in interracial relations (Joyner and Kao, 2005).

Maps Multiracial Americans



Demographics

Multiracists wanting to recognize their full legacy won victory in 1997, when the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) changed the federal rules of the racial category to allow for multiple responses. This resulted in a change in the 2000 US Census, which allowed participants to select more than one of the six available categories, which, in short: "White," "Black or African American," "" Asian, "" American Indian or Alaskan Native , "" Hawaiian natives or other Pacific islands, "and" Other. "Further details are provided in the article: Race (US census). OMB made a mandatory directive for all forms of government in 2003.

In 2000, Cindy Rodriguez reported a reaction to the new census:

For many of the major civil rights groups, the new census is part of a multiracial nightmare. After decades of framing racial issues in black and white terms, they fear that the multiracial movement will break the old alliance, weaken the colored people by breaking them into new subgroups.

Some multiracial individuals feel marginalized by US society. For example, when enrolling in a school or for a job, or when taking a standard test, Americans are sometimes asked to tick boxes appropriate for race or ethnicity. Typically, about five race options are given, with instructions for "checking only one." While some surveys offer "other" squares, these groups of choice together with people of various types are multiracial (eg European/African American Americans grouped with Asian Indians/Native Americans).

The US 2000 census in the write response category has a list of codes that standardize the placement of various write responses-for automatic placement within the race frame mentioned by the US Census. While most responses can be distinguished as falling into one of the five mentioned competitions, there are still some written responses falling into the "Mixed" title that can not be categorized racially. These include "Bi Racial, Combinations, Everything, Much, Mixed, Multi-National, Many, Many and Diverse".

In 1997, Greg Mayeda, a member of the Board of Directors for the Hapa Problems Forum, attended a meeting on a new racial classification for the 2000 US Census. He argued against the multiracial category and for multiracial people counted as all of their races. He argues that a

Separate Multirate boxes do not allow someone who identifies a mixed race as an opportunity to be accurately calculated. After all, we are not just a mixed race. We are representative of all racial groups and should be counted as such. The stand-alone Multiracial box reveals very little about the background of the person checking it out.

According to James P. Allen and Eugene Turner of California State University, Northridge, who analyzed the 2000 Census, most multiracists were identified as white. In addition, the details are as follows:

  • white/Native American and Alaskan Native, at 7.015,017,
  • white/black at 737,492,
  • white/Asian on 727,197, and
  • White/Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander at 125,628.

In 2010, 1.6 million Americans examined "black" and "white" on their census forms, a figure 134% higher than the figure a decade earlier. The number of interracial marriage and relationships, and international transracial and adoption has increased the proportion of multiracial families. Moreover, more individuals may identify many ancestors, as the concept is more widely accepted.

Family multiras

In an article about mixed race children who have identity problems, Charlotte Nitary states:

Wardle (1989) says that today, parents assume one of the three positions as the identity of their interracial children. Some insist that their child is a 'man above all' and that race or ethnicity is irrelevant, while others choose to raise their children with colored parent identities. Another growing parent group insists that the child has the ethnic, racial, cultural and genetic heritage of both parents.

In his book Love Revolution: Interracial Marriage , Maria P. P. Root writes:

Women with children, especially biracial children, have fewer opportunities to remarry than women who do not have children. And since divorce children tend to stick with mothers, being incorporated into new families when their mothers remarry, religious children more threaten racial markers and racial authenticity for families where race is important.

In 2009, Keith Bardwell, a peace judge in Robert, Louisiana, refused to lead marriage to interracial couples and was quickly sued in federal court. See interracial marriage rejection in Louisiana.

About 15% of all new marriages in the United States in 2010 are between races or ethnic pairs different from each other, more than double the share in 1980 (6.7%).

Number of Interracial Marriages, Multiracial Americans Growing ...
src: i.ytimg.com


American multi-racial identity

Given the diversity of family and general social environments in which multiracial children are raised, along with their diversity of looks and heritage, generalizations about the challenges or opportunities of multiracial children are not very useful.

The social identity of children and their parents in the same multiracial family may vary or be the same. Some multiracial children feel pressure from various sources to "choose" or identify as a single racial identity. Others may feel pressured not to abandon one or more of their ethnicities, especially if culturally identified.

Some multiracial individuals attempt to claim new categories. For example, athlete Tiger Woods says that he is not only African American but "Cablinasian," as he is Caucasian, African American, Native American, and Asian descendant.

Some children grow up without race becomes a significant problem in their lives.

[B] with multiracial can still cause problems. Much of the racial construction in America revolves around a peculiar institution known as the 'one-fall rule'... One-drop vanity forms both racism - creating 'caste' arbitrarily - and collective responses against it. To identify as multiracial is to challenge this logic, and consequently, to fall outside the two camps.

[M] every monoracial does see multiracial identity as an option that rejects loyalty to oppressed racial groups. We can see this issue being applied at this time during the US census debate to include the multiracial category - some oppressed monoracial groups believe that this category will lower their numbers and 'benefits'.

Many students call themselves 'half Asian/Black/etc.' came to college to seek cultural knowledge but found themselves not welcome in an ethnic 'whole' peer group. '(Renn, 1998) He found that as a result of this exclusion, many multiracial students expressed the need to create and maintain identifiable multiracial communities on campus. Multiracial people can get to know each other, because "they share their experience in navigating college life as multiracial people," (Renn, 1998) compared to their ethnic group. Multiracial students of different ancestors have their own experiences.


man's quest for Loving Day, a holiday for multiracial Americans
src: www.latimes.com


Identity White and European Americans

Some of the most famous families include Van Salees, Vanderbilts, Whitneys, Blacks, Cheswells, Newell, Battises, Bostons, Eldings of the North; Staffords, Gibsons, Locklears, Pendarvises, Driggers, Galphins, Fairfaxes, Grinsteads (Greenstead, Grinsted and Grimsted), Johnsons, Timrods, Darnalls of the South; and Picos, Yturrias and Bushes from the West.

DNA analysis showed mixed results regarding non-European ancestors in self-identified American America. A 2002 DNA analysis found that about 30% of identifiable White Americans had sub-Saharan African descent recently. A study of 2014 conducted on data obtained from 23andme customers found that the percentage of African American or American Indians among white Americans varied widely by region, with about 5% of the White Americans living in Louisiana and South Carolina having 2% or more of African descent.

Some biographical accounts include the autobiography Life in the Line of Color: The Real Story of the Black Boy Found by Black by Gregory Howard Williams; One Drop: The Hidden Life of My Dad - The Story of Race and Family Secrets written by Bliss Broyard about his father Anatole Broyard; the White Paper documentary about a white man in North Carolina who discovered he was a descendant of white-owned African plantation owners and raped African slaves; and a documentary on The Sanders Women from Shreveport, Louisiana.


biracial celebrities Archives - Mixed Remixed Festival
src: www.mixedremixed.org


Racial identity among Native Americans

In the 2010 Census, nearly 3 million people indicated that their race was Native American (including Alaska Native). Of these, more than 27% typically show "Cherokee" as their ethnic origin. Many First Virginia Families claim the descendants of Pocahontas or some other "Indian princess". This phenomenon has been dubbed the "Cherokee Syndrome". In the US, many people foster an opportunistic ethnic identity as Native Americans, sometimes through Cherokee heritage groups or the Indian Wedding Blessing.

Many tribes, especially those in the Eastern United States, consist mainly of individuals with unambiguous Indigenous American identities, although most are of European descent. In terms of point, over 75% of those registered in Cherokee State have less than a quarter of Cherokee's blood, and the current Principal Principal of the Cherokee Nation, Bill John Baker, is 1/32 Cherokee, amounting to about 3%.

Historically, many Native Americans assimilated into colonial and later American societies, for example through the adoption of English and conversion to Christianity. In many cases, this process occurs through forced assimilation of children sent to special pesantren away from their families. Those who get away with white have the advantage of "white privilege". Today, after a generation of racial bleaching through hypergamy, many Native Americans are visually indistinguishable from White Americans, unlike mestizos in the United States, who may actually have little or no non-native ancestors.

Native Americans are more likely than other racial groups to practice racial exogamy, resulting in a steadily declining proportion of indigenous blood among those claiming Native American identity. Some tribes will even be forced to alienate tribe members who can not provide scientific "evidence" of their native ancestors, usually through the Indian Blood Degree Certificate. Disenrollment has become a controversial issue in Native American reservation politics.

America's largest multiracial group doesn't think of itself that ...
src: cdn.vox-cdn.com


Latin and Latino American Identities

A typical Latino American family may have members with various racial phenotypes, which means the Hispanic spouse may have children who look white and African and/or Native American and/or Asian. Latin Americans have some self-identification; most Latinos identify white in terms of race, while others identify as black and/or Native Americans and/or Asians. Latinos who do not want to identify as one of them identify only as Hispanic and/or some other races as their race.

Many Latin American migrants are mestizo, Amerindian, or other mixed breeds. Multiracial Latin has a limited media appearance; critics have accused the US Hispanic media of neglecting the white and Hispanic black and Hispanic black and Hispanic black and white populations with excessive representation of white and black-eyed Hispanic and Latino American blacks (which resemble Scandinavian and other Northern Europeans than they look like Hispanic whites and Latino America is largely typical of southern Europe), and also mulatto-skinned light and Hispanic and Latin American mestizos (often considered white in Hispanic and Latino populations if they reach middle class or higher social status), especially some actors in telenovela.


November 2015 MASC Newsletter - Multiracial Americans of Southern ...
src: www.mascsite.org


Black and African American Identity

Americans with Sub-Saharan African descent for historical reasons: slavery, Particip Sequel Vs Viratrem, eighth law, the one-drop rule of 20th century legislation, has often been classified as black (historically) or African America, even if they have significant European American or Native American descent. Because slavery became a racial caste, those enslaved and others of African ancestors were classified under the so-called "hypodecent" according to the lower status ethnic group. Many of the European ancestors and appearances "married white" and assimilated into white society because of their social and economic advantages, such as the generation of families identified as Melungeons, are now generally classified as whites but genetically shown to be European and sub- -Asian Africa.

Sometimes people of African-Americans and mixed-breed Americans report having older family members retain the relevant genealogical information. Tracing the African-American lineage can be a very difficult process, since the census did not identify slaves with names before the American Civil War, which meant that most African-Americans did not appear in the record. In addition, many white fathers who use sexual slaves sexually, even those who have long-term relationships such as Thomas Jefferson with Sally Hemings, do not recognize the children of their mixed race slaves in the notes, so the father disappears.

The colonial records of ships and sales of French and Spanish slaves, and records of estates in all former colonies, often have more information about slaves, from which researchers reconstruct the history of slave families. Genealogists have begun to find records of plantations, court records, land deeds and other sources to trace African-American families and individuals before 1870. Since slaves are generally forbidden to learn to read and write, black families go through oral history, which has persistence. Similarly, Native Americans generally do not learn to read and write English, although some do so in the nineteenth century. Until 1930, census counters used the terms colorless and mulatto-colored people to classify people from clear mixed race. When the terms were dropped, as a result of lobbying by the southern congressional bloc, the Census Bureau only used a black or white binary classification, as is typical in the separate southern states.

In the 1980s, parents of mixed race children began organizing and lobbying for the addition of more inclusive racial terms that would reflect the heritage of their children. When the US government proposed the addition of the "bi-racial" or "multiracial" category in 1988, the response from the public was largely negative. Some African-American organizations, and African-American political leaders, such as Congressman Diane Watson and Congressman Augustus Hawkins, are very vocal in their rejection of the category, as they fear losing political and economic power if African Americans reduce their numbers by self-identification.

Since the 1990s and 2000s, the terms mixed race, biracial, and multiracial have been used more frequently in society. It is still most common in the United States (unlike some other countries with a history of slavery) for people with African features that are seen to be identified as or classified only as blacks or African Americans, regardless of other obvious ancestors.

President Barack Obama is of East African and European American descent; he identified as African Americans. A 2007 poll, when Obama was a presidential candidate, found that Americans differ in their responses to how they classify it: the majority of whites and Hispanics classify it as biracial, but the majority of African-Americans classify it as black.

A 2003 study found an average of 18.6% (Â ± 1.5%) European mix in a sample population of 416 African-Americans from Washington, DC. Studies of other populations in other areas have found different ethnic percentages.

Twenty percent of African Americans have more than 25% of European ancestors, reflecting the long history of intergroup unions. The "mostly African" group is essentially African, as 70% of African Americans in this group have less than 15% of European descent. 20% of African Americans in the "most mixed" group (2.7% of the US population) have between 25% and 50% of European ancestors.

Statement by author Sherrel W. Stewart that "most" African Americans have a legacy of Native Americans, not supported by genetic researchers who have conducted extensive population mapping studies. The TV series on African-American ancestors, organized by the intellectual Henry Louis Gates, Jr., has geneticists who discuss in detail various ancestors among African Americans. They note there is popular belief in high-level mixed Native Americans that are not supported by data that has been collected. (Reference is coming)

Genetic testing of male and female line directly evaluates only two of the lineage of a person. For this reason, people at the Gates show have a more complete DNA test.

Critic Troy Duster, writing in The Chronicle of Higher Education, thinks the Gates African American Lives series should tell people more about the limitations of genetic SNP testing. He said that not all ancestors may appear in the test, especially for those who claimed native Americans. Other experts also agree.

Population testing is still underway. Some Native American groups sampled may not share the marker pattern sought. Geneticists recognize that DNA testing has not been able to differentiate among members of different Indigenous American nations. There is genetic evidence for three major migrations to North America, but not for more recent historical differentiation. Moreover, not all Native Americans have been tested, so scientists do not know for sure that Native Americans have only the genetic markers they identify.

Comments
0 Comments